Food Banks Bad, Welfare Good?

I haven’t written a new blog for a while (would love to say I’ve been incredibly productive elsewhere, but…) and technically I haven’t written one today. However, I did find myself getting a leetle bit annoyed by the tone of an article I read online about benefit ‘dependency’, to the point that I started typing a short, swift reply. That short swift reply turned into, hem hem, a bit of a soapbox rant, so for those who like – or at least have a passing interest in – soapbox rants, this is what I wrote:

I think the word ‘dependency’ being used here is disingenuous. It has many negative connotations (drug dependency, alcohol dependency, etc) that by implication stigmatise the ‘dependents’, and redesignate them architects of their own misfortune, which is simply not the case. Drug and alcohol dependency are not simply lifestyle choices and neither is poverty – the reasons they happen are complex and myriad, many of them being social and situational and having little to do with personal choice. Generalisations about the causes and effects are misleading and unhelpful…

That people in poverty are forced to rely on welfare – whether money or food parcels – is a growing reality of our times, but it’s not because they view the welfare state as “an entirely benign force for good in their lives and not something from which they should be parted” or because they have “divested responsibility for themselves.” They are in poverty because they have no jobs (or extremely badly paid jobs) and/or are unable to work for often very complex and insurmountable personal reasons. Those are the social and situational causes, and poverty and welfare reliance is the effect.

Once it is accepted (and it surely must be accepted?) that the number of people available for work in the UK far outnumbers the total of reasonably paid (let’s not aim as high as ‘well paid’ in these austere times – we’ll stick to a living wage as the base line!) jobs available it becomes clear that ‘dependency’ isn’t an issue; the individuals concerned are merely statistics: victims of a mathematical equation over which they – and our political leaders, despite all the rhetoric – have no control. And should we really be stigmatising victims?

In the simplest terms, save for a global disaster of biblical proportions, the UK will never see full employment again. Neither will most (all?) other countries. Looked at in that light, then, the welfare of those in poverty becomes a social/societal issue, and while many societies abdicate responsibility for their poor and needy that is not – despite a political agenda for decades that has taken Margaret Thatcher’s ‘there is no such thing as society’ mantra to heart – a route that most people in the UK would admit to being comfortable with.

To come back to the original question posed, ‘Food Banks Bad, Welfare Good?’, the answer is yes. Welfare is – in theory at least – ‘good’: an ideology that redistributes part of the collective wealth, through taxes, of the most privileged in our society to ensure that the basic needs of the most underprivileged are met. It is reasonable, and, if out-and-out greed is removed from the equation, morally and socially ‘just’. Food banks are ‘bad’, because they are reliant solely on the goodwill of the wealthiest to self regulate their greed and snouts_in_the_trough_3donate according only to the dictates of their individual moral compass. To date, in every society, the goodwill of the rich to self regulate and contribute has pretty much universally proved lacking. While donation to food banks might be ‘trending’ among middle earners interest will almost certainly wane as new, more glamorous, worthy causes emerge and/or their own privileged circumstances come under increasing threat from the greediest piggies at the top end of the trough…

N.B: For balance, HERE is a link to the original online article, which I’m probably guilty of giving more attention than it deserves.


4 thoughts on “Food Banks Bad, Welfare Good?”

  1. What a great post with extremely valid points. I do wish that people would stop generalising that all people on benefits have chosen to be there – most of them haven’t! It is the minority that give them a bad name. I think food banks are a good thing in the right hands. Great – or should I say lovely? – to see you back 😉 Thanks for linking to PoCoLo

    1. Hi Victoria – I think food banks are a necessary evil these days. I would much rather they didn’t exist at all because there really shouldn’t be a need for them in the UK. They exist, and are a growth industry, because of politics and political policy, and I’d rather see that change than see ever-increasing numbers of families reliant on charity handouts for their basic human needs.

      As I tweeted – not blogging so much these days but if and when I will certainly PoCoLo 😀

  2. ”welfare benefits’ figures quoted now include disability and pension payments. Many working families who are eligible for ‘tax credits’ are now described as being welfare claimants just for being paid too low a wage by high-profit multinationals who actually set their hourly rotas and pay levels to deliberately take advantage of those ‘welfare’ top ups to their staff. ‘Full time employment’ is defined as more than 16 hours a week on minimum wage which creates welfare dependency within that workforce by endorsing such practices by companies who can afford to pay the resource they use but are effectively subsidised by tax payers. The Government can say unemployment is dropping yet this is not employment hat creates independence, even less so when 16 year olds are forced to stay in education regardless of the quality of that provision. ‘The poor’ are a group referred to as though they are ‘those other people not us’ When language is used in this way facts become irrelevant. It is simply propaganda. And our flaccid media seem incapable of challenging basic statistical skullduggery. The major press in this country do not have one ball between them.
    Food banks, run by churches and charities are a degrading experience worthy of a Dickensian novel. To anyone who thinks they’re a good idea, I hope you never find yourself unfortunate enough to experience trying to feed, clothe and house your family on job seekers allowance. It is scary as hell. Or perhaps you ought to try it. Then try it for 3 months, 6 months, a year, see how gung ho you feel when every interview, every application comes to nothing. When you have to sell furniture, jewellery, the car, the kids clothes, then their toys. Buy hey, food banks. Yeah. Lets go there.

    1. Of course, Muse. But don’t expect our ‘flaccid’ media to challenge the skullduggery because it is, by and large, implicated in the skullduggery and has a vested interest in perpetuating it.

      As I said, foodbanks are a necessary evil in the current political climate. Save that global catastrophe I spoke about above and/or out and out revolution I think the future will see that evil increasingly normalised and commonplace. The even worse scenario is people becoming so polarised in their views that even charity (and yes, it is degrading and Dickensian) support for the demonised impoverished dries up. There are signs that’s already starting to happen, in fact…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s